On 1.2.2016 05:45, Kashyap Desai wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tomas Henzl [mailto:thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 11:05 PM >> To: 'linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' >> Cc: Sumit.Saxena@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Desai, Kashyap; Uday Lingala >> Subject: megaraid_sas: add an i/o barrier >> >> A barrier should be added to ensure proper ordering of memory mapped >> writes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c >> b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c >> index d9d0029fb1..98a848bdfd 100644 >> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c >> @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ megasas_fire_cmd_fusion(struct >> megasas_instance *instance, >> &instance->reg_set->inbound_low_queue_port); >> writel(le32_to_cpu(req_desc->u.high), >> &instance->reg_set->inbound_high_queue_port); >> + mmiowb(); >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&instance->hba_lock, flags); #endif } > Tomas- > > We may need similar changes around below Functions as well, because there is > no associated readX or mmiowb() call. > megasas_fire_cmd_xscale() > megasas_fire_cmd_ppc() > megasas_fire_cmd_skinny() > megasas_fire_cmd_gen2() > > Also, wrireq() routine in same function megasas_fire_cmd_fusion() need i/o > barrier. I don't think so (with the exception of megasas_fire_cmd_skinny - I missed this one). When two threads try to use a fire_cmd there is no protection of certain ordering, that had to be done in a caller of fire_cmd (for example in megasas_build_and_issue_cmd_fusion) and it seems to me that there is nothing like that. Likely is, that this - a strict ordering of commands - is not needed. The protection which I'm adding is needed when a command consist of a sequence of more than one write, see memory-barriers.txt. (It looks to me that megasas_fire_cmd_ -xscale -ppc -skiny -gen2 do not need the hba_lock unless there is another i/o sequence protected with the same lock (note also that there is no such lock in megasas_fire_cmd_fusion).) I'll add the mmiowb to megasas_fire_cmd_skinny and send a new patch - agreed? --tms > >> -- >> 2.4.3 > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
