Re: [PATCH] storvsc: use small sg_tablesize on x86

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 23:09 +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Olaf Hering [mailto:olaf@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 12:35 AM
> > To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Haiyang Zhang
> > <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] storvsc: use small sg_tablesize on x86
> > 
> > On Fri, Oct 02, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Oct 01, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 20:30 +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
> > > 
> > > > Um, this is a bit architecture specific (I know Azure is x86,
> > > > but
> > > > still).  Can you make the define check CONFIG_32BIT rather than
> > > > CONFIG_X86_32?
> > > 
> > > According to arch/x86/Kconfig there is no such thing.
> > 
> > What is the status of this change? Looks like there is nothing more 
> > to do on my side.
> 
> Olaf,
> 
> We do have the config option: CONFIG_X86_64. Perhaps we could use 
> this. Could you resubmit the patch with this change.

It's not really architecture independent, is it?  Just use the bit
width config.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux