Hello, James. On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:35:34AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > Well, I can see sense in having an error count of everything that comes > back that's not good status because it's easy and has a well defined > meaning (calling it the "error count" is more debatable, agreed). It > appears that Dave and Tejun want the count to mean something else. > Lets treat this as a feature exercise: Dave and Tejun, what do you > want, then we can see if we could add an additional counter giving you > that. Well, currently, for libata devices, all passthrough commands bump it up because the result taskfile is reported via sense data, which is pretty misleading for something named ioerr_cnt. Maybe we can ignore CHECK_CONDITION for ATA passthrough commands but special casing them can be confusing in other ways. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
