On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 09:24 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:29:32PM -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > With this patch in place, this function is now also called by > > core_tpg_set_initiator_node_queue_depth(), where previously it was > > called only during target_alloc_node_acl(). > > > > Might as well drop the ignored return while we're at it.. > > Please add it to the patch description.. > Done. > > > > + continue; > > > > + } > > > > + target_put_session(sess); > > > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&acl->nacl_sess_lock, flags); > > > > } > > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&acl->nacl_sess_lock, flags); > > > > > > It seems at thus point there is no need for ->shutdown_session, it > > > could be folded into ->close_session in a follow on patch. > > > > > > > Not exactly. > > > > It's the final target_put_session() -> kref_put() upon > > se_sess->sess_kref that invokes TFO->close_session(). > > I know. But we are dropping the only long term held reference > here, so the two are more or less equivalent. No. If ->shutdown_session() succeeds, then target-core is responsible for dropping both references. > > > > -void target_get_session(struct se_session *se_sess) > > > > +int target_get_session(struct se_session *se_sess) > > > > { > > > > - kref_get(&se_sess->sess_kref); > > > > + return kref_get_unless_zero(&se_sess->sess_kref); > > > > } > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(target_get_session); > > > > > > I'd be much happier to have a separate prep patch for this.. > > > > Since this will need to hit stable at some point, it likely needs to > > stay with the original bug-fix. > > Please at least document it in the patch description. I'd still > be happier to have the change to target_get_session as a preparatory > patch, though. Done. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html