Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: scsi_transport_fc: Fix a bug in the error handling function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 16:40 -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> The macro startget_to_rport() can return NULL; handle that case
> properly.

OK, can we unwind why you think you could possibly need this?  It would
mean that fc_timed_out was called for a non-FC device, which was
thought to be an impossibility when the fc transport class was
designed.

James

> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> index 24eaaf6..42a908f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> @@ -2081,7 +2081,7 @@ fc_timed_out(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
>  {
>  	struct fc_rport *rport = starget_to_rport(scsi_target(scmd
> ->device));
>  
> -	if (rport->port_state == FC_PORTSTATE_BLOCKED)
> +	if ((rport == NULL) || (rport->port_state ==
> FC_PORTSTATE_BLOCKED))
>  		return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER;
>  
>  	return BLK_EH_NOT_HANDLED;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux