On 12/17/2015 11:24 AM, Lee Duncan wrote: > On 12/14/2015 05:55 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >>>>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> writes: >> >>>> I'm not opposed to having the module option if others (Martin?) feel >>>> they need it, but generally I think it's better to keep things as >>>> simple as possible. So, unless there are strong objections, I would >>>> say no. >> >> Hannes> Agreeing with Ewan here. >> >> Hannes> I guess it's up to you to tell us whether you absolutely need a >> Hannes> module parameter ... >> >> Still not a big ida fan but since the most people seem to be in favor of >> this I guess I'll have to bite the bullet. >> >> I don't see much value in the module parameter since it will require >> customers to tweak their configs and reproduce. Not worth the hassle. >> > > Thank you Martin. I'll look at further cleaning up the host module, but > I think this still much better than leaving the code as is. > James: Do you need me to resubmit this patch now that it's accepted? -- Lee Duncan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
