On Thursday, December 17, 2015 07:51:36 AM James Smart wrote: > On 12/17/2015 12:38 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > On 12/17/2015 12:12 AM, James Smart wrote: > > > > Why isn't this special cased anymore? Is it now supported by all HBAs? > > Yes - if and when/where an async event is generated by the adapter is in > the fw. The special casing wasn't needed in the first place. > > > Hmm. How does this pan out on older cards? > > Does every card sending out this event support the optic > > misconfiguration detection? Or is there a chance that we lose the link > > just because the event isn't properly implemented and we detect it as > > non-operational? > > Every card could - but whether it does is specific to the card and how > it was built and the restrictions made on that card type. The adapter > itself manages that. The event to the driver is solely for reporting. > The driver can't influence optics behavior. > Okay, fair enough. Just wanted to clarify this. Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx> Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
