On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 03:34:50PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 11:36:02 +0100
>
> Omit the unnecessary setting to a null pointer for the variable "param"
> at the beginning of the function "iscsi_set_default_param"
> because it can be directly initialized with the return value
> from the function "kzalloc".
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_parameters.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_parameters.c b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_parameters.c
> index 3a1f9a7..0a8bd3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_parameters.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_parameters.c
> @@ -127,9 +127,8 @@ static struct iscsi_param *iscsi_set_default_param(struct iscsi_param_list *para
> char *name, char *value, u8 phase, u8 scope, u8 sender,
> u16 type_range, u8 use)
> {
> - struct iscsi_param *param = NULL;
> + struct iscsi_param *param = kzalloc(sizeof(*param), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> - param = kzalloc(sizeof(struct iscsi_param), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!param) {
> pr_err("Unable to allocate memory for parameter.\n");
> goto out;
It's better to just get rid of the initialization but leave the
kzalloc() as-is for two reasons.
1) Initializer code normally contains more bugs per line than other
code. I am thinking about dereferencing pointers before checking
for NULL or not checking the allocation for failure.
2) It puts a blank line between the allocation and the check for
failure. It's like a new paragraph. The allocation and the check
should be next to each other.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
