Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: Add badblock management for gendisks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 14:14 -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> 
>> I'm not sure whether it makes sense to continue without badblock
>> management for the RAID code.  I was hoping Neil would comment on
>> that.
>> 
>> -Jeff
>
> Not sure I follow? I believe I've kept all the badblocks functionality
> RAID already had..

What I mean to say is that the RAID code had previously embedded the
badblocks structure in one of its other data structures.  As a result,
you would never get an allocation failure for it.

> On a related note, something I observed when testing with md:
>
> md's badblock list is per-device, and can be seen at:
> 	/sys/block/md0/md/dev-pmem0/bad_blocks
>
> Now if we have badblocks in the gendisks too, there is also:
> 	/sys/block/pmem0/bad_blocks
>
> The two are separate 'accounts' maintained by separate drivers (md for
> the former, and pmem for the latter). This can potentially be
> confusing..
>
> Should we consolidate the two, i.e. make md (re)use the gendisk
> badblocks for its purposes too?

I agree with what Dan said.

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux