On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/5/2015 1:07 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Let's try again.
>
> static inline u64 mult_frac64(u64 x, u32 numer, u32 denom) {
> u64 rem = x % denom;
> u64 quot = do_div(x, denom);
> u64 mul = rem * numer;
>
> return (quot * numer) + do_div(mul, denom);
> }
First of all why not to put this to generic header? We have math64.h
and kernel.h.
Might be a good idea (needs to check current users) to move mult_frac
to math64.h.
Then, x % y is already a problem. After all, you seems messed quot and
remainder.
What about something like
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
#define mult_frac64(x,n,d) mult_frac(x,n,d)
#else
static inline u64 mult_frac64(u64 x, u32 numer, u32 denom) {
u64 r1 = do_div(x, denom);
u64 r2 = r1 * numer;
do_div(r2, denom);
return (x * numer) + r2;
}
#endif
?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
