Re: [PATCH 4/8] pm80xx: add support for ATTO devices during SAS address initiailization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2015-11-02 8:53 GMT+01:00 Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>:
> On 10/30/2015 03:53 PM, Benjamin Rood wrote:
>> ATTO SAS controllers retrieve the SAS address from the NVRAM in a location
>> different from non-ATTO PMC Sierra SAS controllers.  This patch makes the
>> necessary adjustments in order to retrieve the SAS address on these types
>> of adapters.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rood <brood@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>> index feaf504..fdbfab6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>> @@ -636,6 +636,11 @@ static void pm8001_init_sas_add(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
>>                       payload.minor_function = 0;
>>                       payload.length = 128;
>>               }
>> +     } else if ((pm8001_ha->chip_id == chip_8070 ||
>> +                     pm8001_ha->chip_id == chip_8072) &&
>> +             pm8001_ha->pdev->subsystem_vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATTO) {
>> +             payload.minor_function = 4;
>> +             payload.length = 4096;
>>       } else {
>>               payload.minor_function = 1;
>>               payload.length = 4096;
>> @@ -662,6 +667,11 @@ static void pm8001_init_sas_add(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
>>                       else if (deviceid == 0x0042)
>>                               pm8001_ha->sas_addr[j] =
>>                                       payload.func_specific[0x010 + i];
>> +             } else if ((pm8001_ha->chip_id == chip_8070 ||
>> +                             pm8001_ha->chip_id == chip_8072) &&
>> +             pm8001_ha->pdev->subsystem_vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATTO) {
>> +                     pm8001_ha->sas_addr[j] =
>> +                                     payload.func_specific[0x010 + i];
>>               } else
>>                       pm8001_ha->sas_addr[j] =
>>                                       payload.func_specific[0x804 + i];
>>
> The indentation is a bit skewed here.
> Other than that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hannes
Agree with Hannes :), please fix this if you post V2.

Reviewed-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
Jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux