On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 17:56 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:36:23AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > Thanks for looking into this. However, I think we need a motivation in the > > patch description why this patch does not reintroduce the soft lockup > > documented in patch "scsi_remove_target: fix softlockup regression on hot > > remove" (commit bc3f02a795d3). > > Interesting. I tried to find the original report and what state > changes would cause an endless loop here. The original report is this one: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1348679 James > Dan, do you remember any > details about this bug report? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
