On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 14:13 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The advansys drvier uses the request_dma function that is used on ISA
> machines for the internal DMA controller, which causes build errors
> on platforms that have ISA slots but do not provide the ISA DMA API:
>
> drivers/scsi/advansys.c: In function 'advansys_board_found':
> drivers/scsi/advansys.c:11300:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'request_dma' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> The problem now showed up in ARM randconfig builds after commit
> 6571fb3f8b7f ("advansys: Update to version 3.5 and remove compilation
> warning") made it possible to build on platforms that have neither
> VIRT_TO_BUS nor ISA_DMA_API but that do have ISA.
>
> This adds a dependency to only build the driver on ISA based machines
> if they also support ISA_DMA_API, or if they EISA or PCI are also
> enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
> index d2f480b04a52..1d8b8257773d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
> @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ config SCSI_DPT_I2O
> config SCSI_ADVANSYS
> tristate "AdvanSys SCSI support"
> depends on SCSI
> - depends on ISA || EISA || PCI
> + depends on (ISA && ISA_DMA_API) || EISA || PCI
I thought the desire was to avoid a compile failure when ISA && !
ISA_DMA_API? Won't this one fail if ISA is defined with either EISA or
PCI and !ISA_DMA_API?
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
