Re: [PATCH, RFC] blk-mq: use a delayed work item for timeouts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/12/2015 01:34 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 10/12/2015 01:29 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
For some pending NVMe work I'd really love to be able to get my timeouts
from process context.  So far it seems only SCSI and NVMe use the blk-mq
timeout handler, and both don't seem to be particularly excited about
being called from time context.  Does anyone have an objection against
the patch below that switches it to use a delayed work item?  I could
make use of this quickly for NVMe, but for SCSI we still have to deal
with the old request code which can't be switched to a delayed work
as easily.

No that's definitely fine with me, imho most error handling callbacks
should be in process context for ease of use in the driver.

Took a closer look. The patch looks incomplete. The hot path for blk-mq is blk_add_timer(), looks like you left that one alone in the conversion?

Might be easier to just leave the timer alone, and if it actually fires _and_ we have to do something, punt to a workqueue instead of invoking the timeout handler directly.

--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux