Re: [PATCH 1/7] megaraid_sas : Jbod sequence number support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Sumit" == Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Sumit> I will create separate patch for these new flags which are not
Sumit> related to JBOD sequence support. These flags are created to keep
Sumit> APIs in sync across driver and firmware.

*nod*

>> Why -1 here? Presumably MAX_PHYSICAL_DEVICES is a count, not an
>> index.
Sumit> Yes it is count only.  struct MR_PD_CFG_SEQ_NUM_SYNC has "struct
Sumit> MR_PD_CFG_SEQ" as one of its member so struct MR_PD_CFG_SEQ
Sumit> corresponding to PD index "0" is embedded inside struct
Sumit> MR_PD_CFG_SEQ_NUM_SYNC. That's why -1 here.

OK. Just checking.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux