RE: [PATCH V5 11/11] [SCSI] aacraid: Requests at least 2 MSIx in pci_enable_msix_range()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As Tomas Henzl suggested, I have merged 10 and 11 of V5 into single patch (i.e 9 of V6)

Changes from V5:
Applied driver update change at the end.
Merged 10 and 11 of V5 into 9 of V6.
AAC_MAX_MSIX definition change.
aac_msi option description and subject change.

Thanks,
Mahesh

-----Original Message-----
From: James Bottomley [mailto:James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 11:59 PM
To: Tomas Henzl
Cc: Rajinikanth Pandurangan; jbottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; aacraid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Harry Yang; Rich Bono; Mahesh Rajashekhara; Achim Leubner; Murthy Bhat
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 11/11] [SCSI] aacraid: Requests at least 2 MSIx in pci_enable_msix_range()


> On 22.7.2015 18:49, rajinikanth.pandurangan@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Rajinikanth Pandurangan <rajinikanth.pandurangan@xxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Description:
> >         In MSIx mode, we need at least 2 vectors.
> > 
> > Changes from V4:
> >       Newly created for V5 based on review comment.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rajinikanth Pandurangan
> <rajinikanth.pandurangan@pmcs.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm confused by your [PATCH v6] posting: where did this patch go ... do you want it dropped or did you just forget to include it?

James


��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux