Re: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Fix a bug in copy_from_bounce_buffer()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2015-08-09 at 02:01 +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: KY Srinivasan
> > Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 7:55 AM
> > To: 'Ben Hutchings' <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Long Li <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-scsi <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Fix a bug in copy_from_bounce_buffer()
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 12:05 PM
> > > To: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Long Li <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-scsi <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Fix a bug in copy_from_bounce_buffer()
> > > 
> > > Commit 8de580742fee ("scsi: storvsc: Fix a bug in
> > > copy_from_bounce_buffer()"), actually modified the function
> > > copy_to_bounce_buffer().  Is the commit message wrong, or was the
> > patch
> > > applied to the wrong function?
> > > 
> > Ben,
> > 
> > Most likely the message is "misleading". I currently don't have access to the
> > source; I will confirm sometime tonight.
> 
> The commit message is a typo (and is misleading).

Thanks for confirming.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. - Leonard Brandwein

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux