Re: blk-mq vs kmemleak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 06:05:59PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 08/03/2015 03:43 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > The pages allocated for struct request contain pointers to other slab
> > allocations (via ops->init_request). Since kmemleak does not track/scan
> > page allocations, the slab objects will be reported as leaks (false
> > positives). This patch adds kmemleak callbacks to allow tracking of such
> > pages.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas<catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Bart Van Assche<bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> That patch works fine on my test setup, hence:
> 
> Tested-by: Bart Van Assche<bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for testing.

Cc'ing the block layer maintainer since the patches touches this part.
Jens, are you ok with the patch posted below? If yes, would you like me
to re-post or you're happy to pick it up from the list:

http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150803104309.GB4033@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux