Re: [PATCH 1/6] libata: Do not retry commands with valid autosense

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, James.

On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:44:06AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> I'm not arguing that *this* patch is the best way to do it.  You asked
> *why* autosense and that's what I answered.  I think there's time to

Heh, that was mostly me being confused.  I was thinking NCQ autosense
was the only way ATA devices would report sense data.

> work out the implementation details to get them to be correct and well
> structured.

Yeah, definitely.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux