Re: blk-mq vs kmemleak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 10:04:00AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
 > On 07/03/15 09:11, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > After a fuzzing run recently, I noticed that the machine had oom'd, and
 > > killed everything, but there was still 3GB of memory still in use, that
 > > I couldn't even reclaim with /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
 > > ...
 > > I'm wondering if there's just some annotation missing to appease kmemleak,
 > > because I'm seeing thousands of these.
 > >
 > > Or it could be a real leak, but it seems surprising no-one else is complaining.
 > 
 > Dave, with which kernel version has this behavior been observed ?

Linus' current tree

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux