On 06/18/2015 09:06 AM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 06/16/2015 01:37 AM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
>>> Created a thread using alloc_ordered_workqueue() API in order to process
>>> the works from firmware Work-queue sequentially instead of
>>> create_singlethread_workqueue() API.
>>>
>>> Changes in v1:
>>> No need to check for backport compatibility in the upstream kernel.
>>> so removing the else section where driver use
>>> create_singlethread_workqueue() API if alloc_ordered_workqueue() API is
>>> not defined, This else section is not required since in the latest upstream
>>> kernel this alloc_ordered_workqueue() API is always defined.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sreekanth Reddy <Sreekanth.Reddy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
>>> index b848458..7e5926c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
>>> @@ -8085,8 +8085,8 @@ _scsih_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>>> /* event thread */
>>> snprintf(ioc->firmware_event_name, sizeof(ioc->firmware_event_name),
>>> "fw_event%d", ioc->id);
>>> - ioc->firmware_event_thread = create_singlethread_workqueue(
>>> - ioc->firmware_event_name);
>>> + ioc->firmware_event_thread = alloc_ordered_workqueue(
>>> + ioc->firmware_event_name, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
>>> if (!ioc->firmware_event_thread) {
>>> pr_err(MPT3SAS_FMT "failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n",
>>> ioc->name, __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
>>>
>>
>> Hi Sreekanth,
>>
>> Is this change still needed after e09c2c2954684 workqueue: apply
>> __WQ_ORDERED to create_singlethread_workqueue() ? (3.17+)
>
> I won't say that it is compulsory required, but I feel it is better if
> these changes are included. since initially we thought that thread
> created by using create_singlethread_workqueue() will process the
> works sequentially but in-between it has broken and then it is fixed
> by Tejun. So I thought it is better to directly use the
> alloc_ordered_workqueue() as create_singlethead_workqueue() API also
> invoked the same API.
Ok, I was just wondering if maybe create_singlethread_workqueue was
fixed after this patch was initially written. Since it's effectively
the same...
Reviewed-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
-- Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
