Re: [PATCH 10/17] scsi_dh_alua: Use separate alua_port_group structure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:42:16PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> The port group needs to be a separate structure as several
> LUNs might belong to the same group.

The switch to on-stack sense data in alua_rtpg probably should be
a separate patch.

> -static int realloc_buffer(struct alua_dh_data *h, unsigned len)
> +static int realloc_buffer(struct alua_port_group *pg, unsigned len)
>  {

Not directly related to this patch, but what's the reason to have
a buffer hang off the dh_data or now port group?  Seems like a local
allocation in alua_rtpg would be more sensible.

> +	spin_lock(&port_group_lock);
> +	pg = kzalloc(sizeof(struct alua_port_group), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +	if (!pg) {
> +		sdev_printk(KERN_WARNING, sdev,
> +			    "%s: kzalloc port group failed\n",
> +			    ALUA_DH_NAME);
> +		/* Temporary failure, bypass */
> +		spin_unlock(&port_group_lock);
> +		return SCSI_DH_DEV_TEMP_BUSY;
> +	}

As bart mentioned it should be simply enough to move the allocation
and initialization outside the spinlock.  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux