Re: [PATCH 08/17] scsi_dh_alua: Make stpg synchronous

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/11/2015 08:55 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:42:14PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> We should be issuing STPG synchronously as we need to
>> evaluate the return code on failure.
> 
> How does this fit into the calling convention?  It seems like generally
> dm-mpath expects async execution of ->activate.  If we don't actually need
> asynchronous activation we should remove it from all the drivers to have
> a consistent calling convention.
> 
This is just an intermediate step, before the entire thing moves off
to a workqueue and becomes asynchronous again.
It's not meant to be as a standalone patch; I've just split it off
for easier review.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		               zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux