Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] target/rd: Don't pass imcomplete scatterlist entries to sbc_dif_verify_*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 23:25 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2015-04-08 14:13 GMT+09:00 Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Sun, 2015-04-05 at 23:59 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> >> The scatterlist for protection information which is passed to
> >> sbc_dif_verify_read() or sbc_dif_verify_write() requires that
> >> neighboring scatterlist entries are contiguous or chained so that they
> >> can be iterated by sg_next().
> >>
> >> However, the protection information for RD-MCP backends could be located
> >> in the multiple scatterlist arrays when the ramdisk space is too large.
> >> So if the read/write request straddles this boundary, sbc_dif_verify_read()
> >> or sbc_dif_verify_write() can't iterate all scatterlist entries.
> >>
> >> This fixes it by allocating temporary scatterlist if it is needed.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> >> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> ---
> >> * No change from v1
> >>
> >>  drivers/target/target_core_rd.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> >> index ac5e8d2..6e25eaa 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> >> @@ -390,11 +390,12 @@ static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, dif_verify dif_verify)
> >>       struct se_device *se_dev = cmd->se_dev;
> >>       struct rd_dev *dev = RD_DEV(se_dev);
> >>       struct rd_dev_sg_table *prot_table;
> >> +     bool need_to_release = false;
> >>       struct scatterlist *prot_sg;
> >>       u32 sectors = cmd->data_length / se_dev->dev_attrib.block_size;
> >> -     u32 prot_offset, prot_page;
> >> +     u32 prot_offset, prot_page, prot_npages;
> >>       u64 tmp;
> >> -     sense_reason_t rc;
> >> +     sense_reason_t rc = TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> >>
> >>       tmp = cmd->t_task_lba * se_dev->prot_length;
> >>       prot_offset = do_div(tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
> >> @@ -404,10 +405,40 @@ static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, dif_verify dif_verify)
> >>       if (!prot_table)
> >>               return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> >>
> >> -     prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
> >> -                                     prot_table->page_start_offset];
> >> +     prot_npages = DIV_ROUND_UP(prot_offset + sectors * se_dev->prot_length,
> >> +                                PAGE_SIZE);
> >> +
> >> +     /* prot pages straddles multiple scatterlist tables */
> >> +     if (prot_table->page_end_offset < prot_page + prot_npages - 1) {
> >> +             int i;
> >> +
> >> +             prot_sg = kcalloc(prot_npages, sizeof(*prot_sg), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> +             if (!prot_sg)
> >> +                     return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> >> +
> >> +             need_to_release = true;
> >> +             sg_init_table(prot_sg, prot_npages);
> >> +
> >> +             for (i = 0; i < prot_npages; i++) {
> >> +                     if (prot_page + i > prot_table->page_end_offset) {
> >> +                             prot_table = rd_get_prot_table(dev,
> >> +                                                             prot_page + i);
> >> +                             if (!prot_table)
> >> +                                     goto out;
> >> +                             sg_unmark_end(&prot_sg[i - 1]);
> >> +                     }
> >> +                     prot_sg[i] = prot_table->sg_table[prot_page + i -
> >> +                                             prot_table->page_start_offset];
> >> +             }
> >> +     } else {
> >> +             prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
> >> +                                             prot_table->page_start_offset];
> >> +     }
> >>
> >
> > Mmm, how about just explicitly doing sg_link() at prot_table scatterlist
> > creation time instead..?
> 
> Yeap, that would be an optimal solution.  But some architectures don't
> support sg chaining (i.e. !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN).
> 
> > That would save the extra allocation above, and AFAICT make for simpler
> > code.
> 
> Do you prefer fixing it conditionally with using #ifdef ? (i.e.
> sg chaining at creating time if CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN is defined,
> otherwise do the extra allocation above) If so, I'll resubmit the
> patch with such changes.

Yes please.

It would be nice to use sg_link() for the typical case when available,
as long as the #idefs aren't too ugly and limited to target_core_rd.c
code.

--nab

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux