On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:35:55PM -0700, Andy Grover wrote: > So what's next? Were you going to do the LUNs too? In addition to +perf and > less mem usage, going down this path also leads to >256 LUNs per tpg. This just started as a rework of Nic' series, so I'd like to avoid scope creep. I think applying the same dynamic allocation + rcu scheme should work fine for the LUNs, too. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
