Re: [PATCH-v2 02/15] target: Add protected fabric + unprotected device support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/30/2015 6:28 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This patch adds a new target_core_fabric_ops callback for allowing fabric
drivers to expose a TPG attribute for signaling when a T10-PI protected
fabric wants to function with an un-protected device without T10-PI.

This specifically is to allow LIO to perform WRITE_STRIP + READ_INSERT
operations when functioning with non T10-PI enabled devices, seperate
from any available hw offloads the fabric supports.

This is done using a new se_sess->sess_prot_type that is set at fabric
session creation time based upon the TPG attribute.  It currently cannot
be changed for individual sessions after initial creation.

Also, update existing target_core_sbc.c code to honor sess_prot_type when
setting up cmd->prot_op + cmd->prot_type assignments.

Cc: Martin Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Cc: Doug Gilbert <dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c       | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
  drivers/target/target_core_transport.c |  8 +++++++
  include/target/target_core_base.h      |  1 +
  include/target/target_core_fabric.h    |  8 +++++++
  4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
index 95a7a74..5b3564a 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
@@ -581,12 +581,13 @@ sbc_compare_and_write(struct se_cmd *cmd)
  }

  static int
-sbc_set_prot_op_checks(u8 protect, enum target_prot_type prot_type,
+sbc_set_prot_op_checks(u8 protect, bool fabric_prot, enum target_prot_type prot_type,
  		       bool is_write, struct se_cmd *cmd)
  {
  	if (is_write) {
-		cmd->prot_op = protect ? TARGET_PROT_DOUT_PASS :
-					 TARGET_PROT_DOUT_INSERT;
+		cmd->prot_op = fabric_prot ? TARGET_PROT_DOUT_STRIP :
+			       protect ? TARGET_PROT_DOUT_PASS :
+			       TARGET_PROT_DOUT_INSERT;

In this case, if the protect=1 and fabric_prot=1 we will strip won't we?
I think that the protect condition should come first.

  		switch (protect) {
  		case 0x0:
  		case 0x3:
@@ -610,8 +611,9 @@ sbc_set_prot_op_checks(u8 protect, enum target_prot_type prot_type,
  			return -EINVAL;
  		}
  	} else {
-		cmd->prot_op = protect ? TARGET_PROT_DIN_PASS :
-					 TARGET_PROT_DIN_STRIP;
+		cmd->prot_op = fabric_prot ? TARGET_PROT_DIN_INSERT :
+			       protect ? TARGET_PROT_DIN_PASS :
+			       TARGET_PROT_DIN_STRIP;

Same here.

  		switch (protect) {
  		case 0x0:
  		case 0x1:
@@ -644,11 +646,15 @@ sbc_check_prot(struct se_device *dev, struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *cdb,
  	       u32 sectors, bool is_write)
  {
  	u8 protect = cdb[1] >> 5;
+	int sp_ops = cmd->se_sess->sup_prot_ops;
+	int pi_prot_type = dev->dev_attrib.pi_prot_type;
+	bool fabric_prot = false;

  	if (!cmd->t_prot_sg || !cmd->t_prot_nents) {
-		if (protect && !dev->dev_attrib.pi_prot_type) {
-			pr_err("CDB contains protect bit, but device does not"
-			       " advertise PROTECT=1 feature bit\n");
+		if (protect &&
+		    !dev->dev_attrib.pi_prot_type && !cmd->se_sess->sess_prot_type) {
+			pr_err("CDB contains protect bit, but device + fabric does"
+			       " not advertise PROTECT=1 feature bit\n");

Can you place unlikely on these conditions?

  			return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
  		}
  		if (cmd->prot_pto)
@@ -669,15 +675,28 @@ sbc_check_prot(struct se_device *dev, struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *cdb,
  		cmd->reftag_seed = cmd->t_task_lba;
  		break;
  	case TARGET_DIF_TYPE0_PROT:
+		/*
+		 * See if the fabric supports T10-PI, and the session has been
+		 * configured to allow export PROTECT=1 feature bit with backend
+		 * devices that don't support T10-PI.
+		 */
+		fabric_prot = is_write ?
+			      (sp_ops & (TARGET_PROT_DOUT_PASS | TARGET_PROT_DOUT_STRIP)) :

Shouldn't this be converted to bool using !!()?


+			      (sp_ops & (TARGET_PROT_DIN_PASS | TARGET_PROT_DIN_INSERT));
+
+		if (fabric_prot && cmd->se_sess->sess_prot_type) {
+			pi_prot_type = cmd->se_sess->sess_prot_type;
+			break;
+		}
+		/* Fallthrough */
  	default:
  		return TCM_NO_SENSE;
  	}

-	if (sbc_set_prot_op_checks(protect, dev->dev_attrib.pi_prot_type,
-				   is_write, cmd))
+	if (sbc_set_prot_op_checks(protect, fabric_prot, pi_prot_type, is_write, cmd))
  		return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;

-	cmd->prot_type = dev->dev_attrib.pi_prot_type;
+	cmd->prot_type = pi_prot_type;
  	cmd->prot_length = dev->prot_length * sectors;

  	/**
@@ -1231,6 +1250,9 @@ sbc_dif_copy_prot(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned int sectors, bool read,
  	unsigned int i, len, left;
  	unsigned int offset = sg_off;

+	if (!sg)
+		return;
+
  	left = sectors * dev->prot_length;

  	for_each_sg(cmd->t_prot_sg, psg, cmd->t_prot_nents, i) {
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
index 4a00ed5..aef989e 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
@@ -322,11 +322,19 @@ void __transport_register_session(
  	struct se_session *se_sess,
  	void *fabric_sess_ptr)
  {
+	struct target_core_fabric_ops *tfo = se_tpg->se_tpg_tfo;
  	unsigned char buf[PR_REG_ISID_LEN];

  	se_sess->se_tpg = se_tpg;
  	se_sess->fabric_sess_ptr = fabric_sess_ptr;
  	/*
+	 * Determine if fabric allows for T10-PI feature bits to be exposed
+	 * to initiators for device backends with !dev->dev_attrib.pi_prot_type
+	 */
+	if (tfo->tpg_check_prot_fabric_only)
+		se_sess->sess_prot_type = tfo->tpg_check_prot_fabric_only(se_tpg);
+
+	/*
  	 * Used by struct se_node_acl's under ConfigFS to locate active se_session-t
  	 *
  	 * Only set for struct se_session's that will actually be moving I/O.
diff --git a/include/target/target_core_base.h b/include/target/target_core_base.h
index 672150b..fe25a78 100644
--- a/include/target/target_core_base.h
+++ b/include/target/target_core_base.h
@@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ struct se_session {
  	unsigned		sess_tearing_down:1;
  	u64			sess_bin_isid;
  	enum target_prot_op	sup_prot_ops;
+	enum target_prot_type	sess_prot_type;
  	struct se_node_acl	*se_node_acl;
  	struct se_portal_group *se_tpg;
  	void			*fabric_sess_ptr;
diff --git a/include/target/target_core_fabric.h b/include/target/target_core_fabric.h
index 2f4a250..c93cfdf 100644
--- a/include/target/target_core_fabric.h
+++ b/include/target/target_core_fabric.h
@@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ struct target_core_fabric_ops {
  	 * inquiry response
  	 */
  	int (*tpg_check_demo_mode_login_only)(struct se_portal_group *);
+	/*
+	 * Optionally used as a configfs tunable to determine when
+	 * target-core should signal the PROTECT=1 feature bit for
+	 * backends that don't support T10-PI, so that either fabric
+	 * HW offload or target-core emulation performs the associated
+	 * WRITE_STRIP and READ_INSERT operations.
+	 */
+	int (*tpg_check_prot_fabric_only)(struct se_portal_group *);
  	struct se_node_acl *(*tpg_alloc_fabric_acl)(
  					struct se_portal_group *);
  	void (*tpg_release_fabric_acl)(struct se_portal_group *,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux