Hi Andy,
On 3/19/15 12:54 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 17:45 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
Instead of supplying each byte through stack let's use %pM specifier.
Anyone to comment or apply this patch?
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tom Tucker <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
drivers/scsi/fnic/vnic_dev.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fnic/vnic_dev.c b/drivers/scsi/fnic/vnic_dev.c
index 9795d6f..ba69d61 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fnic/vnic_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fnic/vnic_dev.c
@@ -499,10 +499,7 @@ void vnic_dev_add_addr(struct vnic_dev *vdev, u8 *addr)
err = vnic_dev_cmd(vdev, CMD_ADDR_ADD, &a0, &a1, wait);
if (err)
- printk(KERN_ERR
- "Can't add addr [%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x], %d\n",
- addr[0], addr[1], addr[2], addr[3], addr[4], addr[5],
- err);
+ pr_err("Can't add addr [%pM], %d\n", addr, err);
This looks completely reasonable to me.
Tom
}
void vnic_dev_del_addr(struct vnic_dev *vdev, u8 *addr)
@@ -517,10 +514,7 @@ void vnic_dev_del_addr(struct vnic_dev *vdev, u8 *addr)
err = vnic_dev_cmd(vdev, CMD_ADDR_DEL, &a0, &a1, wait);
if (err)
- printk(KERN_ERR
- "Can't del addr [%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x], %d\n",
- addr[0], addr[1], addr[2], addr[3], addr[4], addr[5],
- err);
+ pr_err("Can't del addr [%pM], %d\n", addr, err);
}
int vnic_dev_notify_set(struct vnic_dev *vdev, u16 intr)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
