Re: [TOPIC] scsi-queue tree past and future

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/05/2015 02:31 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> For about 8 month I've merged almost every scsi commit through the
> scsi-queue staging tree, and it seems to have worked out well enough.

>From my user perspective the scsi-queue was an important help and have been using using
it a lot. I hope it will have a future.

Thanks,
Tomas

>
> I've been too busy for the next cycle, so 4.1 will probably have to live
> without it.  I'd like to get feedback on how the tree worked for contributors
> and driver maintainers, and brainstorm how to move forward with it, preferably
> some form of real team maintainance that avoids single points of failure.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux