Re: [PATCH 01/21] lpfc: Fix the iteration count to match the 30 sec comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 10:07 -0400, James Smart wrote:
> Yes,   I'll correct this.

Great, thanks!

>  Trying to make Christoph happy by using git to 
> format all the patches.

We're all happy you're using git to format the patches ... it's just a
minor addition to your commit log to give me the information in the form
I need.

Thanks,

James

> -- james
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/7/2015 11:44 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 14:23 -0500, James Smart wrote:
> >> ---
> > Could you put the signoffs (and any changelog) above here, please.  You
> > seem to be using git to generate the patches, so if you just put them in
> > the git change log the right thing will happen.  If you don't do this,
> > all your patches have to be hand edited to apply them, which is a royal
> > pain for a maintainer.
> >
> >>   drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 2 +-
> >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> >> index 0b2c53a..2b5b910 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> >> @@ -7953,7 +7953,7 @@ wait:
> >>   		 * up to 30 seconds. If the port doesn't respond, treat
> >>   		 * it as an error.
> >>   		 */
> >> -		for (rdy_chk = 0; rdy_chk < 3000; rdy_chk++) {
> >> +		for (rdy_chk = 0; rdy_chk < 1500; rdy_chk++) {
> >>   			if (lpfc_readl(phba->sli4_hba.u.if_type2.
> >>   				STATUSregaddr, &reg_data.word0)) {
> >>   				rc = -ENODEV;
> >> -- 
> >> 1.7.11.7
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > I'm not quite understanding this signoff chain.  It reads like Dick
> > Kennedy is the author, in which case the patch needs a From: <him> at
> > the top to make this clear.  If it's jointly authored, then
> > traditionally he'd still be the first signoff because the series of
> > signoffs represents the transmission chain and you send the patch, so
> > you should be last signoff.
> >
> > James
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux