RFC scsi: aic94xx: use of complete() looks racy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi !

 while reviewing some type missmatch of wait_for_completion_timeout in 
 drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_tmf.c:asd_clear_nexus() a question regarding
 the struct completion use came up:

(line numbers are from 4.0-rc2 linux-next)
351     tascb->completion = &completion;
352
353     ASD_DPRINTK("task not done, clearing nexus\n");
354     if (tascb->tag_valid)
355             res = asd_clear_nexus_tag(task);
356     else
357             res = asd_clear_nexus_index(task);
358     leftover = wait_for_completion_timeout(&completion,
359                                            AIC94XX_SCB_TIMEOUT);
360     tascb->completion = NULL;

this looks racy - atleast I was not able to figure out what would prevent
complete() from accessing a NULL pointer (similarly on line 524/525+545)

e.g. in asd_clear_nexus_tasklet_complete()
85         tcs->dl_opcode = dl->opcode;
86         complete(ascb->completion);
87         asd_ascb_free(ascb);

so if the timeout ever occured would that not result in a NULL access ?

what am I overlooking here ?

thx!
hofrat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux