Re: [Lsf] [TOPIC] scsi-queue tree past and future

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 20:43 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> Well, to clarify what's happening: I'm not running the tests, I asked
> the 0 day kernel testing project to run them on all the patches in my
> tree.  The 0 day project has a bunch of standard tests for all trees and
> then some optional ones (like xfstests) which I asked Fengguang to turn
> on in our case.
> 
> Trinity is part of the 0 day project tests, so I could ask for it to be
> turned on too, 

Oh, I was not aware of that. I tend to consider LTP something completely
unrelated.

> but I'm not sure it would be so useful for SCSI: trinity
> is a sys call fuzzing tool but the sys call exposure of SCSI is pretty
> tiny.  xfstests, which exercise the filesystem data above us provide a
> much wider range of testing.

Yeah I'm really talking at a generic level, just like LTP.

Thanks,
Davidlohr

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux