Hi Nicholas, On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Gavin, > > On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 08:28 +0800, Gavin Guo wrote: >> Hi Nicholas, >> >> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Gavin Guo <gavin.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hi Nicholas, >> > >> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger >> > <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 09:30 +0800, Gavin Guo wrote: >> >>> Hi Nicholas, >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger >> >>> <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> > On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 23:56 +0800, Gavin Guo wrote: >> >>> >> Hi Nicolas, >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger > > <SNIP> > >> >>> >> > At the time, a different set of iser-target related changes ended up >> >>> >> > avoiding this issue on his particular setup, so we thought it was likely >> >>> >> > a race triggered by login failures specific to iser-target code. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > There was a untested patch (included inline below) to drop the legacy >> >>> >> > active_ts_list usage all-together, but IIRC he was not able to reproduce >> >>> >> > further so the patch didn't get picked up for mainline. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > If your able to reliability reproduce, please try with the following >> >>> >> > patch and let us know your progress. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Thanks for your time reading the mail. I'll let you know the result. >> >>> > >> >>> > Just curious, are you able to reliability reproduce this bug in a VM..? >> >>> >> >>> Thanks for your caring, the machine is on the customer side, I've >> >>> asked and now waiting for their response. >> >> >> >> Hi Gavin, >> >> >> >> Just curious if there has been any update on this yet..? >> >> >> >> --nab >> >> >> > >> > Really thanks for your attention. I'm also currently waiting for the >> > customer's reply and will send the email again to ask for the result. >> > However, I think the symptom may be hard to replicate that's why the >> > customer didn't reply me for a long time. Thanks for your time again. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Gavin >> >> Sorry for making you wait so long. I just got the response from the >> customer, they said the general protection fault happened just 2 times >> in the past and cannot be reliably reproduced. And I am now waiting >> for the verification test. >> > > Just a heads up that I'm planning to include this patch in the v3.20-rc1 > PULL request. > > Please let me know if you have any objections. > > Thank you, > > --nab > The bug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
