Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] sg: fix read() error reporting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15-02-11 11:32 AM, Tony Battersby wrote:
Fix SCSI generic read() incorrectly returning success after detecting an
error.

Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tony Battersby <tonyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

For inclusion in kernel 3.20.

--- linux-3.19.0/drivers/scsi/sg.c.orig	2015-02-08 21:54:22.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-3.19.0/drivers/scsi/sg.c	2015-02-10 09:26:09.000000000 -0500
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static ssize_t
  sg_new_read(Sg_fd * sfp, char __user *buf, size_t count, Sg_request * srp)
  {
  	sg_io_hdr_t *hp = &srp->header;
-	int err = 0;
+	int err = 0, err2;
  	int len;

  	if (count < SZ_SG_IO_HDR) {
@@ -575,8 +575,8 @@ sg_new_read(Sg_fd * sfp, char __user *bu
  		goto err_out;
  	}
  err_out:
-	err = sg_finish_rem_req(srp);
-	return (0 == err) ? count : err;
+	err2 = sg_finish_rem_req(srp);
+	return err ? : err2 ? : count;

Tony,
Your point is well made.

I just don't like that last line, using a gcc extension that
hasn't even made it into C11 (or C++11). Wouldn't:
    return err ? err : (err2 ? err2 : count);

be a bit better? I think the following snippet makes the intent
clear but would it generate any more code:
    if (err || err2)
	return err ? err : err2;
    else
        return count;

Doug Gilbert


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux