Re: [PATCH] Initialize off value in asd_process_ctrl_a_user()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 11:34 -0500, Eric B Munson wrote:
> If the asd_find_flash_de() function returns ENOENT the off value will
> be used uninitialized in the call to asd_read_flash_seg().

This is just papering over the problem.  This was my attempt at a proper
fix: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi/91320

Ben.

> Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_sds.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_sds.c b/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_sds.c
> index edb43fd..6f6a5b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_sds.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_sds.c
> @@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ static int asd_process_ctrl_a_user(struct asd_ha_struct *asd_ha,
>  				   struct asd_flash_dir *flash_dir)
>  {
>  	int err, i;
> -	u32 offs, size;
> +	u32 offs = 0, size;
>  	struct asd_ll_el *el;
>  	struct asd_ctrla_phy_settings *ps;
>  	struct asd_ctrla_phy_settings dflt_ps;

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Life would be so much easier if we could look at the source code.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux