On Thursday 04 December 2014 09:24 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:59:58PM +0200, Yaniv Gardi wrote: >> In this change we add support to the generic PHY framework. >> Two UFS phys are implemented: >> qmp-20nm and qmp-28nm. >> >> Also, the files in this change implement the UFS HW (controller & PHY) >> specific behavior in Qualcomm chips. >> Relocation of a few header files is needed in order to expose routines >> and data structures between PHY driver and UFS driver. >> >> Also, this change include the implementation of Inline Crypto Engine (ICE) >> in Qualcomm chips. > > This whole patch is a mess. It does way to many things in one patch, > and it doesn't explain enough of it. > > Please explain why you need it. Especially as the PHY API is a generic > phy abstraction, so having to share defintions between the provider and > consumer seems wrong. Even if you need some shared bits keep them to an > absolute minium insted of moving so much out of the driver directory. > Also if at all possible keep the shared data in a single header under > include/linux instead of having lots of global headers in a deep > directory structure. > > Second split this into patches that do a single things, and explain why > you're doing each: > > 1) header move if/as needed > 2) add 20nm phy driver > 3) add 28nm phy driver > 4) add ufs-qcom driver > 5) add ufs-qcom-ice support > > and so on. +1 -Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
