Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote on 12/03/2014 12:46 PM: > Secondly, Vlad, we have been running additional testing for the last > two days and we have logs from the SCST core which I am including > below which suggests that the SCST core target code excessively stalls > or mishandles an ABORT while processing a NEXUS_LOSS_SESS TMF. > Regardless of your feelings about the target driver code in the kernel > we need to make sure there is not some subtle regression in the core > SCST code paths during TMF processing. I don't see any problem on the SCST core level in the logs. Vlad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
