On 11/24/2014 04:39 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 05:40 -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Can someone review this trivial patch for me? Thanks! > > I don't really think we need reviewers for trivial patches, do we? > > However, the patch is clearly bogus. What's supposed to happen is that > the unset variables (size and offs) get initialised to default values on > error return, which is what's missing for offset, so this is the correct > patch, isn't it? > > James > > --- > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_sds.c b/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_sds.c > index edb43fd..d11b4d7 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_sds.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_sds.c > @@ -1003,6 +1003,7 @@ static int asd_process_ctrl_a_user(struct asd_ha_struct *asd_ha, > } > > size = sizeof(struct asd_ctrla_phy_settings); > + offs = 0; > ps = &dflt_ps; > } > > Yep, that would work, as well. Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
