On 11/24/2014 02:45 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote: >> Von: linux-scsi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [linux-scsi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]" im Auftrag von "Christoph Hellwig [hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> Gesendet: Montag, 24. November 2014 14:23 >> An: Markus Stockhausen >> Cc: ching2048@xxxxxxxxxxxx; thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Betreff: Re: ARCMSR - Notify sense data report - Lost patch? >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:47:02AM +0000, Markus Stockhausen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> sorting out some diffs between the official Arcea driver and >>> the newest 3.18 patches I found a patch that might got lost: >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/20/956 >>> >>> Could you check if that is desired? >> Looks sensible to me. Did you test it? > No not really, as I don't know how. We had a controller crash the last > week and I was wondering about the differences between vendor and > upstream version. So I basically did some code comparison between > the two source. Besides a lot of layout differences and other hacks > this was one of the first things I noticed and wondered what difference > those flags could make. Especially regarding stability. > > Hopefully Ching and/or Tomas know better as they seem repsonsible > for the rest of the 3.18 arcmsr patches. I don't know why Ching hasn't re-posted this in later series. The Areca in-house driver works stable? > > Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
