Re: [PATCH RESEND 6/7] megaraid_sas : Corrected return of wait_event from abort frame path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/17/2014 10:54 AM, Sumit.Saxena@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Corrected wait_event() call which was waiting for wrong completion status(0xFF).
>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> index 8262067..f11c5f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ megasas_issue_blocked_abort_cmd(struct megasas_instance *instance,
>  		cpu_to_le32(upper_32_bits(cmd_to_abort->frame_phys_addr));
>  
>  	cmd->sync_cmd = 1;
> -	cmd->cmd_status = 0xFF;
> +	cmd->cmd_status = ENODATA;
>  
>  	instance->instancet->issue_dcmd(instance, cmd);
>  

Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux