Re: [PATCH 07/10] esp: Use FIFO for command submission

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 21/11/2014 10:27, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> The am53c974 has a design flaw causing it to throw an
> DMA interrupt whenever a DMA transmission completed,
> even though DMA interrupt reporting is disabled.
> This confuses the esp routines as it would register
> a DMA interrupt whenever a cdb has been transmitted
> to the drive.
> So implement an option to use the FIFO for command
> submission and enable it for am53c974.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/am53c974.c |  1 +
>  drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/am53c974.c b/drivers/scsi/am53c974.c
> index b9af8b0..652762e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/am53c974.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/am53c974.c
> @@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ static int pci_esp_probe_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  	esp->host = shost;
>  	esp->dev = pdev;
>  	esp->ops = &pci_esp_ops;
> +	esp->flags |= ESP_FLAG_USE_FIFO;

Why not invert this patch and the previous one, and add this line
directly when the am53c974 driver is born?

>  	pep->esp = esp;
>  
>  	if (pci_request_regions(pdev, DRV_MODULE_NAME)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c
> index 92ab921..ab7d2bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c
> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static void esp_autosense(struct esp *esp, struct esp_cmd_entry *ent)
>  {
>  	struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = ent->cmd;
>  	struct scsi_device *dev = cmd->device;
> -	int tgt, lun;
> +	int tgt, lun, i;
>  	u8 *p, val;
>  
>  	tgt = dev->id;
> @@ -626,7 +626,10 @@ static void esp_autosense(struct esp *esp, struct esp_cmd_entry *ent)
>  
>  	esp->active_cmd = ent;
>  
> -	p = esp->command_block;
> +	if (esp->flags & ESP_FLAG_USE_FIFO)
> +		p = esp->fifo;
> +	else
> +		p = esp->command_block;

Any reason not to use esp->command_block unconditionally?

>  	esp->msg_out_len = 0;
>  
>  	*p++ = IDENTIFY(0, lun);
> @@ -648,12 +651,21 @@ static void esp_autosense(struct esp *esp, struct esp_cmd_entry *ent)
>  	esp_write_tgt_sync(esp, tgt);
>  	esp_write_tgt_config3(esp, tgt);
>  
> -	val = (p - esp->command_block);
> +	if (esp->flags & ESP_FLAG_USE_FIFO)
> +		val = (p - esp->fifo);
> +	else
> +		val = (p - esp->command_block);
>  
>  	if (esp->rev == FASHME)
>  		scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_FLUSH);

For consistency with what you do elsewhere, please move this in the "else".

> -	esp->ops->send_dma_cmd(esp, esp->command_block_dma,
> -			       val, 16, 0, ESP_CMD_DMA | ESP_CMD_SELA);
> +	if (esp->flags & ESP_FLAG_USE_FIFO) {
> +		scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_FLUSH);
> +		for (i = 0; i < val; i++)
> +			esp_write8(esp->fifo[i], ESP_FDATA);
> +		scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_SELA);
> +	} else
> +		esp->ops->send_dma_cmd(esp, esp->command_block_dma,
> +				       val, 16, 0, ESP_CMD_DMA | ESP_CMD_SELA);
>  }

Hmm, what about a wrapper

    __send_cmd(esp, data, esp_count, dma_count, cmd, force_flush,
               force_fifo)
    {
        use_fifo =
            force_fifo || (esp->flags & ESP_FLAG_USE_FIFO) ||
            esp_count == 1;
        if (force_flush || use_fifo || esp->rev == FASHME)
            scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_FLUSH);
        if (use_fifo) {
            for (i = 0; i < val; i++)
                esp_write8(esp->fifo[i], ESP_FDATA);
            scsi_esp_cmd(esp, cmd);
        } else {
            if (data != esp->command_block)
                memcpy(esp->command_block, data, length)
            esp->ops->send_dma_cmd(esp,
                                   esp->command_block_dma,
                                   esp_count, dma_count, 0,
                                   cmd | ESP_CMD_DMA);
        }
    }

    send_cmd(esp, data, esp_count, dma_count, cmd)
    {
        __send_cmd(esp, data, esp_count, dma_count, cmd, false, false);
    }

This would be:

    send_cmd(esp, esp->command_block, val, 16, ESP_CMD_SELA);

>  static struct esp_cmd_entry *find_and_prep_issuable_command(struct esp *esp)
> @@ -727,7 +739,10 @@ static void esp_maybe_execute_command(struct esp *esp)
>  
>  	esp_check_command_len(esp, cmd);
>  
> -	p = esp->command_block;
> +	if (esp->flags & ESP_FLAG_USE_FIFO)
> +		p = esp->fifo;

Any reason not to use esp->command_block unconditionally?

> +	else
> +		p = esp->command_block;
>  
>  	esp->msg_out_len = 0;
>  	if (tp->flags & ESP_TGT_CHECK_NEGO) {
> @@ -789,13 +804,15 @@ build_identify:
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!(esp->flags & ESP_FLAG_DOING_SLOWCMD)) {
> -		start_cmd = ESP_CMD_DMA | ESP_CMD_SELA;
> +		start_cmd = ESP_CMD_SELA;
>  		if (ent->tag[0]) {
>  			*p++ = ent->tag[0];
>  			*p++ = ent->tag[1];
>  
> -			start_cmd = ESP_CMD_DMA | ESP_CMD_SA3;
> +			start_cmd = ESP_CMD_SA3;
>  		}
> +		if (!(esp->flags & ESP_FLAG_USE_FIFO))
> +			start_cmd |= ESP_CMD_DMA;
>  
>  		for (i = 0; i < cmd->cmd_len; i++)
>  			*p++ = cmd->cmnd[i];
> @@ -814,7 +831,9 @@ build_identify:
>  			esp->msg_out_len += 2;
>  		}
>  
> -		start_cmd = ESP_CMD_DMA | ESP_CMD_SELAS;
> +		start_cmd = ESP_CMD_SELAS;
> +		if (!(esp->flags & ESP_FLAG_USE_FIFO))
> +			start_cmd |= ESP_CMD_DMA;
>  		esp->select_state = ESP_SELECT_MSGOUT;
>  	}
>  	val = tgt;
> @@ -825,7 +844,10 @@ build_identify:
>  	esp_write_tgt_sync(esp, tgt);
>  	esp_write_tgt_config3(esp, tgt);
>  
> -	val = (p - esp->command_block);
> +	if (esp->flags & ESP_FLAG_USE_FIFO)
> +		val = (p - esp->fifo);
> +	else
> +		val = (p - esp->command_block);
>  
>  	if (esp_debug & ESP_DEBUG_SCSICMD) {
>  		printk("ESP: tgt[%d] lun[%d] scsi_cmd [ ", tgt, lun);
> @@ -836,8 +858,17 @@ build_identify:
>  
>  	if (esp->rev == FASHME)
>  		scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_FLUSH);
> -	esp->ops->send_dma_cmd(esp, esp->command_block_dma,
> -			       val, 16, 0, start_cmd);
> +
> +	if (esp->flags & ESP_FLAG_USE_FIFO) {
> +		scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_FLUSH);
> +		for (i = 0; i < val; i++)
> +			esp_write8(esp->fifo[i], ESP_FDATA);
> +
> +		scsi_esp_cmd(esp, start_cmd);
> +	} else {
> +		esp->ops->send_dma_cmd(esp, esp->command_block_dma,
> +				       val, 16, 0, start_cmd);

   send_cmd(esp, esp->command_block, val, 16, start_cmd);

> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static struct esp_cmd_entry *esp_get_ent(struct esp *esp)
> @@ -1646,7 +1677,7 @@ static int esp_msgin_process(struct esp *esp)
>  
>  static int esp_process_event(struct esp *esp)
>  {
> -	int write;
> +	int write, i;
>  
>  again:
>  	write = 0;
> @@ -1872,6 +1903,10 @@ again:
>  			if (esp->msg_out_len == 1) {
>  				esp_write8(esp->msg_out[0], ESP_FDATA);
>  				scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_TI);
> +			} else if (esp->flags & ESP_FLAG_USE_FIFO) {
> +				for (i = 0; i < esp->msg_out_len; i++)
> +					esp_write8(esp->msg_out[i], ESP_FDATA);
> +				scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_TI);
>  			} else {
>  				/* Use DMA. */
>  				memcpy(esp->command_block,

    __send_cmd(esp, esp->msg_out, esp->msg_out_len, esp->msg_out_len,
               ESP_CMD_TI, true, esp->rev == FASHME);

> @@ -1947,13 +1982,23 @@ again:
>  		}
>  		break;
>  	case ESP_EVENT_CMD_START:
> -		memcpy(esp->command_block, esp->cmd_bytes_ptr,
> -		       esp->cmd_bytes_left);
> -		if (esp->rev == FASHME)
> +		if (esp->flags & ESP_FLAG_USE_FIFO) {
>  			scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_FLUSH);
> -		esp->ops->send_dma_cmd(esp, esp->command_block_dma,
> -				       esp->cmd_bytes_left, 16, 0,
> -				       ESP_CMD_DMA | ESP_CMD_TI);
> +			while (esp->cmd_bytes_left) {
> +				esp_write8(esp->cmd_bytes_ptr[0], ESP_FDATA);
> +				esp->cmd_bytes_ptr++;
> +				esp->cmd_bytes_left--;
> +			}
> +			scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_TI);
> +		} else {
> +			memcpy(esp->command_block, esp->cmd_bytes_ptr,
> +			       esp->cmd_bytes_left);
> +			if (esp->rev == FASHME)
> +				scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_FLUSH);
> +			esp->ops->send_dma_cmd(esp, esp->command_block_dma,
> +					       esp->cmd_bytes_left, 16, 0,
> +					       ESP_CMD_DMA | ESP_CMD_TI);
> +		}

    send_cmd(esp, esp->cmd_bytes_ptr, esp->cmd_bytes_left, 16,
             ESP_CMD_TI);

>  		esp_event(esp, ESP_EVENT_CMD_DONE);
>  		esp->flags |= ESP_FLAG_QUICKIRQ_CHECK;
>  		break;
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h b/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h
> index 975d293..27dcaf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.h
> @@ -478,6 +478,7 @@ struct esp {
>  #define ESP_FLAG_WIDE_CAPABLE	0x00000008
>  #define ESP_FLAG_QUICKIRQ_CHECK	0x00000010
>  #define ESP_FLAG_DISABLE_SYNC	0x00000020
> +#define ESP_FLAG_USE_FIFO	0x00000040
>  
>  	u8			select_state;
>  #define ESP_SELECT_NONE		0x00 /* Not selecting */
> 

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux