Re: [PATCH] bnx2fc: do not add shared skbs to the fcoe_rx_list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Chad,

On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 16:02 -0700, Eddie Wai wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 10:12 +0200, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
> > 
> > On 07/25/2014 10:02 AM, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
> > > In some cases, the fcoe_rx_list may contains multiple instances
> > > of the same skb (the so called "shared skbs").
> > > 
> > > the bnx2fc_l2_rcv thread is a loop that extracts a skb from the list,
> > > modifies (and destroys) its content and the proceed to the next one.
> > > The problem is that if the skb is shared, the remaining instances will
> > > be corrupted.
> > > 
> > > The solution is to use skb_share_check() before adding the skb to the
> > > fcoe_rx_list.
> > > 
> > > [ 6286.808725] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [ 6286.808729] WARNING: at include/scsi/fc_frame.h:173 bnx2fc_l2_rcv_thread+0x425/0x450 [bnx2fc]()
> > > [ 6286.808748] Modules linked in: bnx2x(-) mdio dm_service_time bnx2fc cnic uio fcoe libfcoe 8021q garp stp mrp libfc llc scsi_transport_fc scsi_tgt sg iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support coretemp kvm_intel kvm crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel e1000e ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel lrw gf128mul glue_helper ablk_helper ptp cryptd hpilo serio_raw hpwdt lpc_ich pps_core ipmi_si pcspkr mfd_core ipmi_msghandler shpchp pcc_cpufreq mperf nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd sunrpc dm_multipath xfs libcrc32c ata_generic pata_acpi sd_mod crc_t10dif crct10dif_common mgag200 syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt i2c_algo_bit ata_piix drm_kms_helper ttm drm libata i2c_core hpsa dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod [last unloaded: mdio]
> > > [ 6286.808750] CPU: 3 PID: 1304 Comm: bnx2fc_l2_threa Not tainted 3.10.0-121.el7.x86_64 #1
> > > [ 6286.808750] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL120 G7, BIOS J01 07/01/2013
> > > [ 6286.808752]  0000000000000000 000000000b36e715 ffff8800deba1e00 ffffffff815ec0ba
> > > [ 6286.808753]  ffff8800deba1e38 ffffffff8105dee1 ffffffffa05618c0 ffff8801e4c81888
> > > [ 6286.808754]  ffffe8ffff663868 ffff8801f402b180 ffff8801f56bc000 ffff8800deba1e48
> > > [ 6286.808754] Call Trace:
> > > [ 6286.808759]  [<ffffffff815ec0ba>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> > > [ 6286.808762]  [<ffffffff8105dee1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x61/0x80
> > > [ 6286.808763]  [<ffffffff8105e00a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> > > [ 6286.808765]  [<ffffffffa054f415>] bnx2fc_l2_rcv_thread+0x425/0x450 [bnx2fc]
> > > [ 6286.808767]  [<ffffffffa054eff0>] ? bnx2fc_disable+0x90/0x90 [bnx2fc]
> > > [ 6286.808769]  [<ffffffff81085aef>] kthread+0xcf/0xe0
> > > [ 6286.808770]  [<ffffffff81085a20>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140
> > > [ 6286.808772]  [<ffffffff815fc76c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> > > [ 6286.808773]  [<ffffffff81085a20>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140
> > > [ 6286.808774] ---[ end trace c6cdb939184ccb4e ]---
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c | 7 +++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
> > > index 785d0d7..a190ab6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
> > > @@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ static int bnx2fc_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> > >  	struct fc_frame_header *fh;
> > >  	struct fcoe_rcv_info *fr;
> > >  	struct fcoe_percpu_s *bg;
> > > +	struct sk_buff *tmp_skb;
> > >  	unsigned short oxid;
> > >  
> > >  	interface = container_of(ptype, struct bnx2fc_interface,
> > > @@ -423,6 +424,12 @@ static int bnx2fc_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> > >  		goto err;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > +	tmp_skb = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > > +	if (!tmp_skb)
> > > +		goto err;
> > > +
> > > +	skb = tmp_skb;
> > > +
> > >  	if (unlikely(eth_hdr(skb)->h_proto != htons(ETH_P_FCOE))) {
> > >  		printk(KERN_ERR PFX "bnx2fc_rcv: Wrong FC type frame\n");
> > >  		goto err;
> > > 
> Seems logical, but this patch requires some testing which ought to be
> verified by the Qlogic team.  Thanks.

Any update about this?
Is the QLogic team still reviewing this patch?

Thanks,
Maurizio Lombardi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux