Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: Introduce blkdev_issue_zeroout_discard() function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Ted" == Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> writes:

Ted> So I'd be in favor of adding a flag to to blkdev_issue_zeroout(),
Ted> and I would have a slight preference for also modifying
Ted> sb_issue_zeroout so the flag gets plumbed all the way through to
Ted> the fs-level callers.

OK. I'll do that, then. I always liked the flag better. I was just
trying to minimize the impact.

What would you prefer as the default for the ext4 use case? To allocate
or to discard?

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux