Re: [PATCH 4/6] scsi: stop passing a gfp_mask argument down the command setup path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/06/2014 08:40 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is no reason for ULDs to pass in a flag on how to allocate the S/G
> lists.  While we don't need GFP_ATOMIC for the blk-mq case because we
> don't hold locks, that decision can be made way down the chain without
> having to pass a pointless gfp_mask argument.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux