On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:42:26PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > I don't mind if you change it. However I plan to release > sg3_utils-1.40 in the next 2 or 3 weeks, so that would > be the earliest a revised sg_reset would be available for > distros. Improving error reports is something I always > like to do (so ENODEV for the "in progress" case seems a > bit strident). Doug, are you fine with changing the error code to EAGAIN similar to what we get elsewhere when a O_NONBLOCK open would have to block? If that's something you can prepare sg3_utils for I'd like to send a patch for it for the 3.19 merge window. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html