Re: [PATCH v2 10/12] IB/srp: Use block layer tags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:43:15AM +0000, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote:
> However, it was looking at scmd->tag, which is always 0xff (at 
> least in those early discovery commands).  scmd->request->tag 
> looks like it is the field that has the correct values.
> 
> Also, I noticed that scmd->tag is just an 8 bit field, so
> it could never represent a large number of tags.

Yes, we need to get rid of scmd->tag.  Hannes had a patchset to get
started on it, and I hope either he or someone else will have time to
get back to it ASAP.

> Just to confirm: After calling scsi_init_shared_tag_map()
> in non-mq mode, will scmd->request->tag be based on 
> controller-wide tag allocation (never using the same
> value at the same time for the request queues of multiple
> devices in that controller)?

Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux