Re: fix blk-mq for SPI hosts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> ping?

Sorry, forgot to reply. Yes, it worked fine, on the initial Ultra 1 and 
additionally on Ultra 2 too.

> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 05:13:56PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Fix the assumption that we can treat all blk-mq requests as tagged.  For
> > traditional SCSI that's wrong, as being tagged has a very explicit meaning
> > on the wire.
> > 
> > This is a little bit different from the version Meelis tested earlier, but
> > the concept is the same.  I didn't want to add a Tested-by tag as it's
> > different enough, though.
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> ---end quoted text---
> 

-- 
Meelis Roos (mroos@xxxxxxxx)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux