Re: [PATCH 2/5] scsi: bfa: bfa_fcs_lport.c: Cleaning up missing null-terminate by switching from strncpy to strzcpy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:13:10AM +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> Ensures that the string is null-terminate in connection with the
> use of strncpy, by switching from strncpy to strzcpy.
> 

I wish the changelogs were more clear that we have no reason to think
this is a real issue.

> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c
> index ff75ef8..78af89e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_lport.c
> @@ -2633,7 +2633,7 @@ bfa_fcs_fdmi_get_hbaattr(struct bfa_fcs_lport_fdmi_s *fdmi,
>  	strncpy(hba_attr->driver_version, (char *)driver_info->version,
>  		sizeof(hba_attr->driver_version));

Why do we not change this one?

>  
> -	strncpy(hba_attr->os_name, driver_info->host_os_name,
> +	strzcpy(hba_attr->os_name, driver_info->host_os_name,
>  		sizeof(hba_attr->os_name));

strlcpy() would also be totally safe here.  It's also safe for patch
patch 3 and patch 4.  Patch 5 is trickier to audit so I don't know if
strlcpy() is safe.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux