On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:17:39AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > Hi all, > > Hopefully this is the right list for this report... > > I hit the following kernel bug reliably by running xfstests test > generic/234 against XFS using 10GB LVM test/scratch volumes on top of a > ~100GB virtio_blk block device. The virt block device is file-backed on > the host. Jens, I thought the segment merging bug was fixed a while ago. Did we manage to not include parts of it for 3.17? > > >From the console: > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel BUG at drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:160! > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP > Modules linked in: xfs libcrc32c cfg80211 rfkill snd_hda_codec_generic ppdev snd_hda_intel snd_hda_controller snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm snd_timer snd serio_raw virtio_balloon soundcore virtio_console parport_pc parport i2c_piix4 sunrpc virtio_blk virtio_net qxl drm_kms_helper ttm ata_generic virtio_pci virtio_ring drm virtio pata_acpi > CPU: 0 PID: 1442 Comm: xfsaild/dm-3 Not tainted 3.17.0+ #97 > Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > task: ffff8800c6483460 ti: ffff880118034000 task.ti: ffff880118034000 > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa00729e5>] [<ffffffffa00729e5>] virtqueue_add_sgs+0x415/0x430 [virtio_ring] > RSP: 0018:ffff880118037678 EFLAGS: 00010002 > RAX: ffff88011808b000 RBX: ffff8801180377e8 RCX: 0000000000000003 > RDX: ffffea0003667102 RSI: ffff8801180377d0 RDI: ffff880118037730 > RBP: ffff8801180376e8 R08: ffff8800d78caf70 R09: 0000000000000020 > R10: ffff8800c6483460 R11: ffff8800c6484050 R12: ffff8801180377e8 > R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 0000000000000081 R15: 0000000000000020 > FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88011ae00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b > CR2: 00007fffa85ff0c0 CR3: 0000000001e14000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 > Stack: > ffff880118037698 0000000000000304 ffff8800d78caf70 ffff8801180377d0 > 0000000300000000 ffff88011808b000 ffff880118037730 ffff880000000002 > ffff8801180376e8 ffff8800d78caf70 ffff880118037730 0000000000000002 > Call Trace: > [<ffffffffa006a42f>] __virtblk_add_req+0xdf/0x1c0 [virtio_blk] > [<ffffffffa006a5f2>] ? virtio_queue_rq+0xe2/0x280 [virtio_blk] > [<ffffffffa006a616>] virtio_queue_rq+0x106/0x280 [virtio_blk] > [<ffffffff813d71f1>] __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x1d1/0x350 > [<ffffffff813d7bb0>] blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x70/0xa0 > [<ffffffff813d8a6d>] blk_mq_insert_requests+0xfd/0x2d0 > [<ffffffff813d9a2b>] blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x13b/0x160 > [<ffffffff813cd5c1>] blk_flush_plug_list+0xc1/0x240 > [<ffffffff813d8f2a>] blk_sq_make_request+0x2ea/0x5d0 > [<ffffffff81656395>] ? dm_get_live_table+0x5/0xb0 > [<ffffffff813c7760>] generic_make_request+0xe0/0x130 > [<ffffffff813c7828>] submit_bio+0x78/0x160 > [<ffffffffa02ffcc6>] _xfs_buf_ioapply+0x2e6/0x420 [xfs] > [<ffffffffa0300328>] ? __xfs_buf_delwri_submit+0x1d8/0x5b0 [xfs] > [<ffffffffa02fff22>] xfs_buf_submit+0xd2/0x300 [xfs] > [<ffffffffa0300328>] __xfs_buf_delwri_submit+0x1d8/0x5b0 [xfs] > [<ffffffffa03021af>] ? xfs_buf_delwri_submit_nowait+0x2f/0x50 [xfs] > [<ffffffffa03021af>] xfs_buf_delwri_submit_nowait+0x2f/0x50 [xfs] > [<ffffffffa0340635>] xfsaild+0x275/0xe30 [xfs] > [<ffffffffa03403c0>] ? xfs_trans_ail_cursor_first+0xb0/0xb0 [xfs] > [<ffffffff810cda79>] kthread+0xf9/0x110 > [<ffffffff810cd980>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x250/0x250 > [<ffffffff8182717c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 > [<ffffffff810cd980>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x250/0x250 > Code: ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 eb 84 48 8b 4d b8 8b 55 b0 48 c7 c6 19 42 07 a0 48 c7 c7 78 50 07 a0 31 c0 31 db e8 10 5d 3b e1 e9 4d fd ff ff <0f> 0b bb fb ff ff ff e9 41 fd ff ff 66 66 66 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f > RIP [<ffffffffa00729e5>] virtqueue_add_sgs+0x415/0x430 [virtio_ring] > RSP <ffff880118037678> > ---[ end trace 823f74f9a11abe26 ]--- > > This occurs on the latest tot kernel (commit 0429fbc0bdc2) but appears > to originate sometime during the 3.16 development cycle. A bisect lands > on the following commit: > > 05f1dd53 block: add queue flag for disabling SG merging > > To corroborate that, the appended diff appears to work around the > problem for me (included as a data point, not a fix, as I'm not familiar > with the block layer). Let me know if I can provide any more info, > thanks! > > Brian > > ---8<--- > > diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > index 0a58140..5861bd72 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > vblk->tag_set.ops = &virtio_mq_ops; > vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = virtblk_queue_depth; > vblk->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE; > - vblk->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE; > + vblk->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE|BLK_MQ_F_SG_MERGE; > vblk->tag_set.cmd_size = > sizeof(struct virtblk_req) + > sizeof(struct scatterlist) * sg_elems; > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ---end quoted text--- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
