On 10/11/14 13:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:21:56PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 10/07/14 16:37, Jens Axboe wrote:
Lets do this separate, as explained last time, it needs to be evaluated
on its own and doesn't really belong in this series of patches.
Hello Jens,
A few minutes ago I have resent this patch to you with the LKML in CC. I
hope that Christoph agrees with leaving out this patch from this series
without me having to resend this series. BTW, Sagi promised me off-list to
review the other patches in this series.
Ignoring patches is one of the easier tasks, np. Do you want me to
merge all the srp updates? They normally go through the IB tree, but
I can pick them up this time so that we don't need to synchronize the
two trees.
Hello Christoph,
Since patch 1/12 already has been sent separately to Jens patches
2/12..12/12 remain. The SRP initiator changes in this series depend on
the blk-mq and scsi-mq features added in patches 2/12..4/12. I think we
should avoid splitting these patches over multiple kernel trees to avoid
having to deal with dependencies between kernel trees.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
