Re: [PATCH] target: iscsi: iscsi_target_tpg.c: Cleaning up possible size overwriting in conjunction with sprintf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 19:55 +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> Changed same snprintf and sprintf to strlcpy and strlcat.
> This will guarantee that the string size is not overwritten,
> and they are significantly faster than sprintf also.

I don't disagree with the change, but I think the changelog is
misleading.

strlcpy(ptr, ...) then strlcat(ptr, ...) does not use the known
length of the first copied string and is generally not faster than
ptr += snprintf(ptr, ...) then sprintf(ptr,...)

And a couple slightly unrelated bits:

> diff --git a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_tpg.c b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_tpg.c
> index c3cb5c1..6fc8bfe 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_tpg.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_tpg.c
> @@ -608,7 +608,6 @@ int iscsit_tpg_set_initiator_node_queue_depth(
>  int iscsit_ta_authentication(struct iscsi_portal_group *tpg, u32 authentication)

This function could be made static and the prototype removed from
the .h file if it is moved above its one caller in this file.

>  {
>  	unsigned char buf1[256], buf2[256], *none = NULL;

Moderately large stack use here.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux